If you have undergone a painful ParaGard IUD removal procedure and have suffered from unpleasant side effects, you may have grounds to file a lawsuit. If your lawsuit is successful, you could receive compensation for your injuries. However, before you file a lawsuit, it is important to speak to an experienced birth control lawyer.
Class action lawsuit
The ParaGard IUD is a copper-copper hybrid contraceptive device that has been causing women side effects ever since its introduction in 2009. Teva Pharmaceuticals initially designed it but it was purchased by The Cooper Companies in 2017. This new company is responsible for the lawsuits filed against Teva and Paragard. In many cases, the company has not given physicians adequate instructions or warned patients about the increased risks associated with the Paragard IUD.
The Paragard IUD is a long-term birth control device that is placed at the base of the uterus. It contains a copper coil that releases tiny copper particles that cause an inflammatory reaction in the body that prevents sperm from reaching an egg. The device can prevent pregnancy for up to 10 years. Many women, however, have experienced broken paragard IUD removal side effects after the device was implanted.
The amount of compensation awarded in a Paragard lawsuit will depend on the severity of the plaintiff’s injuries. Depending on the severity of the injury, settlements will be divided into several tiers. The highest tier will include claims by women who have experienced severe infections or permanent physical injuries from the ParaGard IUD, while lower tiers will involve cases where the woman only suffered minor side effects.
Failure to warn about perforation of the uterus
The Paragard IUD is a small T-shape plastic IUD that can prevent pregnancy for up to 10 years. However, the device has a number of design and manufacturing defects. Upon removal, it can crack, causing severe damage to the uterus and nearby organs. Many women who remove this device require surgery. Some of these women may file lawsuits against the manufacturer.
The Paragard IUD is designed in such a way that the arms of the device can break during removal, causing injury. While Teva Pharmaceuticals claims that it warned about the risk of breakage, there is no proof to show how often the warnings were given.
The FDA has received over 2,200 reports of Paragard breakage, perforation, and migration since 2010. These reports have prompted lawsuits alleging that the device manufacturers failed to adequately warn consumers of its risk of injury during removal. The device is defectively designed, and can result in organ perforation or even infertility.
Failure to warn about complications of surgery
The manufacturer of the ParaGard IUD has been found to have failed to warn women about serious complications associated with the removal of the contraceptive device. The company was aware of the risks, but failed to warn patients about them. Despite this, six out of seven women who had the contraceptive device removed underwent surgery to remove the broken pieces.
During the procedure, the IUD can break and lodge inside the uterus. The broken pieces may irritate nearby organs and can lead to infection or bleeding. The device may need to be replaced. This is an invasive procedure, and it can result in severe pain and even life-altering complications.
The manufacturer of the Paragard IUD, Teva Pharmaceuticals, owed consumers a duty of care to warn them about the risks associated with the device. Because of this, the company may be liable for damages associated with this procedure.
